Books are
something we have had around for centuries and will probably still have for years
to come, but no one knows in which format or on what platform we will be
reading them. Over the years, the physical book has definitely improved, both
the paper and ink. However with advancement in technology, the screen has
opened up a whole new door for us to read – be it on a kindle, smartphone or
iPad. This change of print to screen, already has some of us on board enjoying
this new platform, however some people just aren’t that convinced as of yet.
People are always
on the go, from home to work, to a café or on some form of transport. As a pass
time in such situations people tend to read books, magazines, advertisements
and newspapers. But all of these seem to be somewhat bulky and in the way.
Younger generations seem to have lost the interest in the physical printed
material and are moving on in the technological direction. Some say that books
will soon become antiques but I will try not to jump the gun myself and state
such assumptions. Technological devices such as kindles, iPads, laptops and
smartphones have helped the reading industry especially with tech-nerds, or
even children who struggle with problems such as dyslexia, autism or other
cognitive disabilities, especially when it comes to reading, writing and
learning.
Physical print has
its problems but then again, so does a screen. Physical books are somewhat nor
comfortable or practical. They are bulky and most of the time requires both
hands to hold and keep in place. If you are a person who is constantly on the
go, this might resort to frustration, especially if the book is of an
inconvenient size and/or weight. When
done from reading a book, advert, magazine or newspaper one simply puts it back
onto their shelf or desk and doesn’t touch is again until they maybe read it
again. It doesn’t cross many peoples mind to share it with others, others who
do not have the commodity of owning that book perhaps. It’s also inconvenient to
hold more than one book at a time. Carrying one or two books might be do-able
but more could even end up with someone hurting themselves, for example their
backs with Repetitive Strain Injury (RSI), such as with students at school.
I could obviously
go on to criticize books or any other printed material for hours but this can
all be seen from a different perspective – that of a book lover. There are
people who love to get lost in their own world and forget about what is going
on around them. People achieve this through music, others with books… of some
sort. People seem to prefer the physical feel and touch of paper. It helps them
feel a connection to what they are reading, a connection with the author, a
sense of ownership. You also don’t need to fork out a wad of cash to purchase a
simple book or magazine, as you would need for a kindle or technological device
– even though that argument could be backed up with only having that major
expense once. Kindles, iPads and laptops need power, and at some point they
will run out. This is just an inconvenience in itself. If you’re on some sort
of transport, in a power out or simply in a room with no power outage, there is
no way of charging your device to read. With printed material on the other
hand, this will never happen. The actual visual of knowing how far into a book
you are, with seeing the amount of pages is also exiting and a relief. It’s a
great feeling closing a book after 1000 pages and feeling that sense of relief
and accomplishment more than just swiping your finger on a screen and realizing
you’ve reached the end. There are also superb bookstores around the world,
rooms filled with information and excitement. No such feeling can be felt
through that folder in your e-book now can it? Even getting your favorite book
signed by your favorite author is an experience in itself. Meeting them in
person is always more fulfilling than downloading a scanned signatures or
receiving a poster with their signature on it as it won’t be as authentic -But
I won’t be getting into that as I might easily bob off topic.
One linked topic
to this ‘shift from print to screen’ is the learning process of students in
class. Is this shift from printed material to screen really helping them or is
it just distracting them from the now? From what I’ve gathered so far it all
depends on the student, whether or not s/he prefers to read on a tablet or from
a printed source, is pretty much up to his/her personal taste.
Maryanne Wolf, a well-known
researcher and professor on reading and learning, states in her book: ‘A Proust
and a Squid’, that us humans are not born with the ability to read with some
sort of circuit in our brain. Type is something man made and its recognition
isn’t inbuilt in our bodies like that of vision and speach.
Our brain later on
begins to associate and recognize words through networks in our brain, just
like we learn to associate the difference between a cat and a dog or a truck
and a car but classify them as both animals and vehicles. In fact, if we leap
back a few centuries we see that lots of letters were associated to actual real
life objects, such as the ‘S’ to a snake or ‘O’ as the sun.
The left and right
pages of a book let us know more or less how much we have read and what we have
left to read. It gives us an idea of where we stand with the text presented in
front of us. When we turn a printed page, one after the other, we are somewhat
leaving a tracker in our brain, letting us look back with a photographic memory
as to where we read or saw something specific. On the other hand, when someone
is scrolling or browsing through information on a screen, the reader must stop
and re-focus on a starting point, making it harder to look back and remember
where s/he saw that particular piece of information. Surely simulated
pagination exists but this doesn’t mean that pressing a button to go to the
next page is the same as flipping through the trail of pages yourself with your
own fingertips. As mentioned in the article in my literature review by Bradon
Keim, Psychologist Erik Wästlund carried out
experiments with students to see who struggled the most when it came to reading
– the students reading on paper or those on screen? The students reading on
screen seemed to have ended up more tired and stressed. With further research Wästlund
also concluded that students reading on paper seem to remember the information engaged
for a longer period of time. According to Wästlund, students who read text on
screen need to scroll through text and this caused lack of concentration for a
new focal point and simply was more distracting.
In another research carried out
by Anne Mangen in 2013, where half the 72 10th grade students, read
text on paper and the other half, read the exact same text on a screen. Those
who read on paper seemed to have gotten a better grasping of the text and
scored better than those who read on screen.
Another major issue, which I managed to tweak through my essay, is
feasibility. Books are not that
expensive to buy, but then again some are. A hardback print of a book is never
cheap. There are the cost of it being made, being shipped to you, the authors
cut and more. Magazines still cost money but it doesn’t mean they will be any
cheaper as an online subscription to your kindle or iPad. Surely there aren’t
costs of printing but there are the costs of research, design, editorial and
creative costs towards that magazine. However sometimes you might benefit from
a monthly to a yearly subscription which will cost less than buying the
magazine in print, not to mention it being better and having those Issues on
one hand held device rather than spread around your living room.
Many schools which are adopting the iPad, or any other hand held device
are lucky to be able to fund it. Parents do not always agree with their
children having €400 worth of technology which their child or another child may
break. A cheaper alternative is either the iPad mini or a non-Apple product.
Some schools have adopted to use iPads if they are brought in from home and if
not, the students must stick to the older traditional ways of book-pen-paper. Typing
on these devices might be frustrating for some and may slow down a student
especially if needed for reading or writing heavy text.
Reference:
Bury, L., 2013. Young
adult readers 'prefer printed to ebooks’. The Guardian, [online] 25 November.
Available at: <http://www.theguardian.com/books/2013/nov/25/young-adult-readers-prefer-printed-ebooks.> [Accessed 22 January 2015].
Fluent in 3 months,
2010. Books are dead - it's time to ditch 15th century technology. [online]
Available at: <http://www.fluentin3months.com/ebooks/. > [Accessed 22 January 2015].
Gomez, J., 2009. Print
is Dead: Book in Our Digital Age. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
Hall, P., 2009.
Sagmeister: Made You Look. New York: Harry N. Abrams.
Harry Ransom Center,
2013. Print Before Gutenberg. [online] Available at: <
http://www.hrc.utexas.edu/exhibitions/permanent/gutenbergbible/history/#top>
. [Accessed 12 January 2015].
Jabr, F. , 2013. The
Reading Brain in the Digital Age: The Science of Paper versus Screens.
Scientific American, [online] Available at: <http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/reading-paper-screens/> [Accessed 27 January 2015].
Keim, B. , 2014. Why the
Smart Reading Device of the Future May Be ... Paper. WIRED, [online] Available
at: http://www.wired.com/2014/05/reading-on-screen-versus-paper/. [Accessed 13 December 2014].
Kennedy,
G., 2012. Using iPads with students with intellectual disabilities. Spectronics
blog [blog] 15 may. Available at: <http://www.spectronics.com.au/blog/tools-and-resources/using-ipads-with-students-with-intellectual-disabilities/> [Accessed 21 January 2015].
Novin, G., 2010. Chapter
3 - A Symbiotic Relationship : Books. A history of Graphic Design [blog]
Available at: < http://guity-novin.blogspot.com/2010/02/history-of-graphic-design-books.html> [Accessed 23 January 2015].
Patient.co.uk, 2014.
Repetitive Strain injury. [online] Available at: http://www.patient.co.uk/health/repetitive-strain-injury-leaflet [Accessed 25 January 2015].
Skills You Need, n.d.
Writing Skills. [online] Available at: <http://www.skillsyouneed.com/about.html.> [Accessed 27 January 2015].
Bibliography.
Analogue artists defying the
digital age | Culture | The Guardian. [ONLINE] Available at: <http://www.theguardian.com/culture/2011/apr/24/mavericks-defying-digital-age.> [Accessed 27 January 2015].
Paper vs digital reading is an
exhausted debate | Books | The Guardian. [ONLINE] Available at:<http://www.theguardian.com/books/booksblog/2014/mar/31/paper-vs-digital-reading-debate-ebooks-tim-waterstone.> [Accessed 27 January 2015].
Reading on a Kindle can cause you
to lose the plot | Daily Mail Online. 2015. [ONLINE] Available at:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2730460/Reading-Kindle-cause-lose-plot-Researchers-electronic-books-make-significantly-harder-readers-absorb-details.html. [Accessed 27 January 2015].
The Advantages of eBooks Versus
Traditional Books - TopTenREVIEWS.. [ONLINE] Available at: <http://online-bookstores-review.toptenreviews.com/the-advantages-of-ebooks-versus-traditional-books.html.> [Accessed 27 January 2015].
The People of the Book vs The
People of the Kindle – Tablet Magazine. 2015. The People of the Book vs The
People of the Kindle – Tablet Magazine. [ONLINE] Available at: <http://tabletmag.com/jewish-arts-and-culture/books/159041/ann-marlowe-books-essay.> [Accessed 27 January 2015].
Why A Book Will Always Be Better
Than A Kindle. [ONLINE] Available at<,http://elitedaily.com/life/culture/why-a-book-will-always-be-better-than-a-kindle/.> [Accessed 27 January 2015].
No comments:
Post a Comment